Skip to main content

SOUTHEAST ASIA 2024—MARCH 7, DAY 2 AT ANGKOR ARCHAEOLOGICAL PARK

MARCH 7:  We were up on time and ready to go on Day 2 of the Angkor Wat Sunrise-Sunset Tour booked through Get Your Guide, also known as the “All You Can Stand Temple Tour.”   

I have to say, we were disappointed in the tour guide we had on our first day.  He wasn’t very inspired, nor was he particularly informative.  He imparted little information, historical or architectural, about the temples we visited beyond their original Khmer names, which were so polysyllabic and unreproducible as to have flown in one ear and right out the other.  It seemed that this guide saw his main task to direct us to what he thought were the best locations for Instagramming.  Not my thing, and I was hungry for information.

Hoping for a better experience the second day, we took our rental scooter to the meeting point, where we joined our small group on a tourist bus. 

Some of those on the bus had been with us the day before, which was both good news and bad news.  One couple (to the immediate left above), two quick-witted, sarcastic, very engaged guys from London, we were happy to see again.  We'd recommended Miss Wong for cocktails and they'd recommended buying weed in Bangkok--legally, of course.  

Another couple (all the way up in front on the left), a rather embittered and entitled middle-aged man from the Midwest and his (probably) mail-order, middle-aged, equally dissatisfied and even more entitled Thai bride, we were not so happy to see again.  Tipping the day’s scales to the good, however, was our new guide for Day 2, a man well-informed and eager to answer whatever questions we and our fellow travelers threw at him.

We visited seven temples on Day 2, but before I get into that, a primer on Cambodian temple architecture might help to understand the photos below.  Wiki Angkor has a very detailed article on the subject, concentrating on Angkor Wat as its exemplar, but this summary from (believe it or not) a real estate property guide might be more digestible: 

[T]he vision and architectural style of the Khmer Empire were at an all time high during the Angkor period. This was primarily in the late 8th century to 15th century CE….

While a number of buildings were constructed during the Angkor period, non-religious buildings used wood as [the] primary material while religious structures used stone. This means most non-religious buildings have deteriorated over time while only religious buildings have stood the test of time. Moreover, construction for these buildings were done over a number of years so architectural styles have changed and been adapted to these buildings.

Despite the differences in architectural styles over the years, most of the elements, foundation, and more of the ancient Khmer architecture remains the same.

In most Khmer religious structures, there are two main elements that are always integrated into the temple:  the stairway to heaven and the bas-reliefs.  From the summary:

Temples built in the Khmer Empire generally include a staircase since it represents the stairs leading to where the gods are, which is why it’s generally called the stairway to heaven.  Moreover, all Khmer style stairs are always steep with an angle between 45 to 70 degrees.

A clear element that distinguishes Khmer architecture from other styles are the bas-reliefs included in all religious temples. These bas-reliefs are simply scenes, representations, or depictions of religion, mythologies, and Khmer history sculpted into stone. 

In addition to the steep staircases and stone carvings, there are other architectural features and auxiliary structures commonly included in Khmer temple complexes.  From the summary:

All religious buildings constructed in the Khmer Empire have been built with a number of structures necessary for their faith. Whether the temple is large or small, these structures are almost always included. Some of these structures are the following:

Library.  One of the most important structures added in temples are libraries although it’s not indicated in historical or religious texts on why they are necessary. However, it’s been debated that they are also used as a shrine and not just a place where books and religious texts are kept. Moreover, these libraries are always placed beside the entrance to the temple’s enclosure in pairs.  {The library below is one of a pair at Angkor Wat.]

 
Temple mountain.  Representing Mount Meru [the equivalent of Olympus], the home of the deities according to Hindu mythology, a temple mountain is always constructed within religious structures.
 

Prang.  A prang, which is a tall spire, generally represents the zenith of Mount Meru where the deities lived.

Bakan.  A bakan or central sanctuary is an important structure in a religious temple since it’s dedicated to that temple’s primary deity. Generally, in the central sanctuary, a statue of the primary deity is constructed. However, if the temple’s deity is Shiva, the representative icon there is a linga.  [A linga is an abstract representation of the Hindu god Shiva, usually a short cylindrical pillar-like symbol, made of stone, metal, gem, wood, clay or precious stones—in other words, a phallic symbol].


Gallery.  Galleries are often added along the temple’s axis or its wall, where it’s open on either or both sides. These galleries were originally all long hallways on all sides of the bakan until half galleries were constructed in the earlier days of the 12th century.

Enclosure
.  Khmer temples are generally defined by enclosures wherein there is a specific center to the temple. Moreover, while there are walls surrounding the temple, the enclosures here specifically refer to the space in between the temple and the innermost wall.

Gopura.  The entrance [gate] to the temple is often called gopura and it often has the shape of a cross with a wide base since it closely follows the wall of the enclosure.

This plan by Baldiri shows both the enclosure and the gopura of Angkor Wat.

Cambodian temples are typically constructed from the following materials, as described in the  summary:

Laterite.  [This is a soft, reddish rock composed mainly of iron and aluminum oxides. Due to weathering in hot and wet climates, it gradually gains strength and becomes a hard mass or crust that can be quarried as stone.]  Since laterite can help strengthen the foundation of a temple, it’s often used as a base for large religious structures as well as for other hidden areas within it.

Brick. The material most often used for all religious structures is brick, specifically for smaller temples.

Sandstone. Different materials like sandstone are necessary to delicately craft specific elements within a temple. However, eventually once the process of obtaining sandstone became easier, some temples were built purely from sandstone.

Our guide pointed out that in many instances, the sandstone blocks, some weighing as much as 1.5 Tons each, were laid without mortar, meaning they were precisely cut.  A word on construction logistics from Wiki Angkor:

The sandstone was quarried and transported from Mount Kulen, a quarry approximately 40 km (25 mi) northeast.

The route has been suggested to span 35 km (22 mi) along a canal towards Tonlé Sap lake, another 35 km (22 mi) crossing the lake, and finally 15 km (9 mi) against the current along Siem Reap River, making a total journey of 90 km (55 mi).

Based on experiments, the labour force to quarry, transport, carve and install so much sandstone probably ran into the thousands, including many highly skilled artisans.

Armed with this basic overview of Cambodian temple architecture, here is a look at the seven temples we visited on Day 2.

Pre Rup, dedicated in 961, a Hindu temple in the temple mountain style made of brick, laterite, and sandstone. The temple's name means "turn the body," which has led some historians to conclude it was built as a royal crematorium.



Eastern Mabon
(island temple), built in the 10th c. to honor the king’s parents and dedicated to the Hindu god Shiva, it stands on what was an artificial island at the center of the now dry East Baray reservoir.





Ta Som, a small temple built at the end of the 12th century by King Jayavarman VII and dedicated to his father.

 

Neak Pean, built in the mid-12th c., is a Buddhist circular mebon which sits in the middle of an artificial island in the Preah Khan Baray reservoir.  Originally designed as a hospital, it was thought bathing in each of the pools here, representing earth, wind, fire, and water, would cure disease.

 


Preah Khan, the penultimate temple we visited, is a good example of just how extensive these Angkor temple complexes were and what comprehensive roles they played in civic and religious life.  Wiki Preah Khan offers a good description:

Preah Khan (Khmer: ប្រាសាទព្រះខ័ន; "Royal Sword") is a temple at Angkor, Cambodia, built in the 12th century for King Jayavarman VII to honor his father. …The temple is flat in design, with a basic plan of successive rectangular galleries around a Buddhist sanctuary complicated by Hindu satellite temples and numerous later additions. Like the nearby Ta Prohm, Preah Khan has been left largely unrestored, with numerous trees and other vegetation growing among the ruins.

The temple's foundation stela has provided considerable information about the history and administration of the site: the main image, of the bodhisattva Avalokiteśvara in the form of the king's father, was dedicated in 1191 (the king's mother had earlier been commemorated in the same way at Ta Prohm). 430 other deities also had shrines on the site, each of which received an allotment of food, clothing, perfume and even mosquito nets; the wealth and treasure of this ruin includes gold, silver, gems, 112,300 pearls and a cow with gilded horns. The institution combined the roles of city, temple and Buddhist university: there were 97,840 attendants and servants, including 1000 dancers and 1000 teachers.

  

 




 

 


Day 2 was billed as the sunset tour, and our last stop was Phnom Bakheng, a temple high upon a hill, from which we could watch the sun set over Siem Reap in one direction and view the temple at Angkor Wat in the other.

Phnom Bakheng is a Hindu temple in the form of a temple mountain built at the end of the 9th c. and dedicated to Shiva. 

That Hindu origin didn’t phase two Buddhist monks in saffron robes, shooting the sunset with iPad and smart phone.


After an eight-hour day of sightseeing in 35 C. heat with 95% humidity, we were ready for a dip in the pool,

and a breezy ride on the scooter into downtown Siem Reap,

for a cocktail at the Scribe Bar at FCC Angkor,

and dinner at a nice restaurant, the name of which -unfortunately-neither of us can recall. 


Keep it real!

Marilyn

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 





Comments

Popular posts from this blog

I FEEL THE EARTH MOVE UNDER MY FEET

  I feel the earth move under my feet I feel the sky tumbling down, tumbling down I just lose control Down to my very soul.                                     Carole King, 1971 This is a very personal post--about a very personal apocalypse, one quite different from the Biblical one imaged above. Carole King's words come to mind because they describe how I feel about this upside down, ass-backwards moment in time.   While there are good things happening in the world, their scale when compared to the bad things that are happening seems to me pitifully dwarfed.  When you look at this short list of events and trends, can you tell me what's right with this picture?  Do these items upset your even keel and threaten to drown you in pessimism?  Consider... Russia and Israel are killin...

THE BROLIGARCHS V. DEMOCRACY

Although not elected by the American people, the world’s wealthiest person, a South African businessman, is running the United States government with the blessing of its chief executive and without meaningful opposition from the legislature or definitive censure by the judiciary.   What is going on?   Has business trumped politics, and if so, doesn’t that raise an interesting question:        Is capitalism compatible with democracy? In pondering this, my research led me to an American billionaire; a German emeritus professor of political science at the Berlin Social Sciences Center; and a Dutch former member of the European Parliament, now a Fellow at the Stanford Cyber Policy Center, all of whom had quite a lot to say.     First, Peter Thiel, the billionaire. Peter Thiel’s Wiki bio says he co-founded PayPal with Elon Musk; he was the initial outside investor in Mark Zuckerberg’s Facebook; and he co-founded Palantir, the big-d...

NEW GAME, NEW RULES

Let me set the stage.   I am a U.S. citizen and a permanent resident of Germany.   In other words, I am an immigrant.   That status didn’t happen overnight and it didn’t come easily.   When we moved to Italy, it took me five years to convert my visa to a Permesso di Soggiorno.   When we subsequently moved to Germany, I had to surrender my Italian residency permit, and it took me another five years to obtain my Daueraufenthaltstitel .   In each country, I jumped through the hoops, produced the necessary documents, fulfilled the language requirements, attended the obligatory immigration appointments, paid my fees, didn’t attempt to work until I could do so legally, and counted the days.   In short, I respected the process and the law.   It has always been crystal clear to me that I live here at the discretion of the German government.   If I screw up, they can “ask” me to leave.   Therefore, I don’t have much sympathy for people who ju...