Skip to main content

TRUMP V. UNITED STATES

 

Yesterday, the Supreme Court of the United States made law by debasing and destroying it. 

The 6-3 majority decision erased with the stroke of a pen a couple of provisions of the U.S. Constitution and scribbled over several federal laws as they apply to the President, making it perfectly peachy for him or her, while in the White House, to:

Hold office after engaging in or aiding an insurrection, which declares Section 3 of the 14th Amendment officially dead. 

Accept gifts from a foreign leader, which hollows out Article 1, Section 8 of the Constitution, the emoluments clause, because if it's good enough for Thomas and Alito, it should be good enough for a President.

Sell classified information to the highest bidder, which steamrolls right over 18 US Code, §798 (a), paving the way for grifts “the likes of which we’ve never seen before.”

Accept election campaign contributions from foreign leaders like Victor Orban, which until yesterday was prohibited by 52 US Code, §30121, because, well, why not?

Direct the Attorney General to throw political opponents or media critical of a President's performance into jail without due process of law, because a President who is above the law controls the law.

And finally, Justice Kagan’s and Vladimir Putin’s personal favorites, assassinate a political rival, because murder convictions are really for the little people.

And these are just the things that occurred to me in the past 24 hours!  There are likely more contortions of common sense, flights of illogic, and debasements of decency lurking in this decision.  Any President is now free to find and exploit them all.  (Joe, if you're listening, you still have time to contact a Navy Seal.)

What the f*ck is going on here?  What is the end game of the six conservative Justices and those who put them on the Court?  (I’m looking at you, Leonard Leo and you, Mitch McConnell.)  Is the goal of Citizen’s United to enshrine the Golden Rule—namely, those with the gold rule?  Is the goal of Dobbs to make sure American business has a steady supply of “essential workers,” not immigrants, but Americans born of citizens who cannot afford to cross state lines for an abortion?  Is the goal of Loper, which killed the Chevron doctrine, to deregulate capitalism regardless of the impact on our health and welfare? 

Yesterday’s decision is surely about more than making sure Mr. Trump does not see the inside of a courtroom before November 5, 2024.  And this line of recent cases mentioned above is surely about more than partisan politics.  There is a larger mission afoot here whose origins lie outside the Court and whose ideas go well beyond a traditional conservative agenda.  As I see it, the mission is twofold, both political and cultural.



The political prong of the mission is Project 2025 and its implementation scheme found in Schedule F.  The goal is to be realized through the unitary executive and the substitution of the old-fashioned civil service test with a loyalty test.  The aim is to dramatically reduce the role of the federal government, make the legislative branch subservient to the President, and give the chief executive the power to hire and fire at will. The Court’s decision yesterday created a glide path for success of this prong.

The cultural prong of the mission is Christian nationalism, founded on the idea that, since white Christians colonized this country in the 1600s, things ought to stay that way.  Christian nationalism is designed to keep indoctrinated, frightened white people busy-busy hating stigmatized, frightened non-white people, while the indoctrinators and stigmatizers get rich.  The Court’s decision in 303 Creative (remember the web designer who refused to create a wedding website for a same-sex couple?), although decided on free speech grounds, makes it clear that this Court can hardly wait to sacrifice the separation of church and state on the altar of religious freedom next term.

If this Court and its enablers have their way, the U.S. government will be reduced to a standing army, and perhaps a national weather service, and Americans will be left with a smoking corpse ready to be reborn as a Christian nation run behind the scenes—no, run openly—by cynical kleptocrats.   

Thank you, Trump vs United States. The case could not have been more aptly named.

Keep it real!

Marilyn 

Comments

  1. Rebecca ProngosJuly 2, 2024 at 10:32 PM

    Horrendous!! Truly unbelievable...

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

IN CASE OF EMERGENCY BREAK GLASS

A vocal critic of Benito Mussolini, Antonio Gramsci, Italian philosopher and politician,  was imprisoned for his political views in 1926; he remained in prison until shortly before his death in 1937.   From his cell, he wrote the  Prison Letters in which he famously said, “I’m a pessimist because of intelligence, but an optimist because of will."   In this time of upheaval, when the post-World War II world order is dying, a new world order is being born, and monsters roam the earth, it is from Gramsci's dual perspective that I write this post.    I will be brief. Th e window to oppose America’ s headlong rush into authoritarianism at home and neo-imperialism abroad by congressional or judicial means has closed.   Law firms, universities, businesses, the press, media, foundations, and individuals alike who have been deemed "insufficiently aligned" with the Administration's agenda, have been intimidated into submission by frivolous lawsuits, expe...
8 comments
Read more

DISPUTING KEATS

The great English poet John Keats wrote in his magnificent 1819 poem, Ode on a Grecian Urn , “Beauty is truth, truth beauty,--that is all Ye know on earth, and all Ye need to know.”  Were that it were so!   But poetry cannot hide the fact that the truth is sometimes ugly.  Consider two current cases. First, the war in Gaza and the destruction and famine it has wrought.   Policy makers, scholars, and pundits can argue whether what is happening in Gaza (and to some extent, in the West Bank) is genocide, whether the leveling of Gaza and the systematic killing of its people is equivalent to the Holocaust, or whether Palestinians have the right to free themselves by any means necessary from an open-air prison.   They can debate whether Israel has become an apartheid, undemocratic state, or whether the only way to achieve security in Israel is to ring-fence or destroy Hamas. And they can construct theories about who has the “right” to live in historic Palestine, e...
Post a Comment
Read more

THE IRON TRIANGLE

Corruption.   It’s like an operating system running in the background on the Computer of Life that inflects and infects everything we do and what is done to us.   Corruption is epidemic, endemic, and systemic. Universal, it is everywhere and all at once.   When he was the director of the FBI, Robert E. Mueller III gave an address to the Citizens Crime Commission of New York and opened a new window on the operating system of corruption:   transnational organized crime.   He called this new operating system an “iron triangle.” Its three sides:  organized criminals, corrupt government officials, and business leaders.    In her June 17, 2025, Substack , Heather Cox Richardson recalled Mueller’s address in an account of foreign investment in President Trump’s businesses.   She wrote: Eliot Brown of the Wall Street Journal reported that Mukesh Ambani, the richest man in India, is now one of the many wealthy foreign real estate develope...
Post a Comment
Read more