Skip to main content

UKRAINIAN LESSONS

Vladimir Putin launched a full-scale invasion of Ukraine at 5 a.m. CET this morning.  From everything I’ve read and seen, the invasion will most certainly succeed.  It is painfully clear that Ukraine, while brave and resolute, is no match for Russia’s military might.  No matter how much intelligence and cyber support is furnished, no matter how much military hardware is shipped, and no matter how much financial aid is made available to Ukraine, without military intervention by western democracies---that is, without troops on the ground---Ukraine cannot defend itself alone.  It will be defeated by Russia.  The West will not save it.

The syntax, grammar, and vocabulary that will define Ukraine’s defeat have not yet been translated from Russian into Ukrainian, but the sense is already clear.  Whether Ukraine, like Crimea, is annexed by Russia; or like Belarus, becomes a Russian vassal state; or like Finland, is forced to play the pre-scripted role of a “NATO-independent” nation, is really a matter of semantics.  Russia, an unforgiving and implacable professor of punishment, will deliver its lecture to Ukraine and the rest of the world in brutal language.

And what are the Ukrainian lessons?  On the geopolitical level, they teach us that western economies dependent on fossil fuels are vulnerable to petro-states, that international law can be broken without meaningful consequences, and that western democracies that play by the rules are disadvantaged against rogue players like Putin.  These geopolitical lessons are, I think, indisputable.

But the Ukrainian lessons received on the individual level are the ones I fear the most.  I mean Putin’s subtexts that lead to conclusions antithetical to the common good, which risk corroding and dispiriting the human soul.  These are the lessons that, if left unchallenged, will have a fundamental, psychic impact on how people conduct their lives and treat each other:

  • Bullying works.
  • Crime pays.
  • Mutually-assured destruction = unilaterally-assured aggression.
  • Might makes right.
  • Truth is information control.
  • History is rewritten by the losers.
  •  Good does not always triumph over evil.
  • For the very powerful, there are no consequences.


Putin’s Ukrainian lessons scream from his Kremlin lectern that pure evil is a universal language.  That's true.  But how can we answer this frightening truth?  We can reply only in our own language, in a voice that has become quiet but which has not been silenced.  It’s the voice in each of us that names and claims the people we love, the things we do to help others, and the beauty we make and protect. This is our voice and it says NO, we will not passively accept that there is only evil in the world and that evil is winning.  In our own voices and in our own names, we will do all that we can to counterbalance evil with good.

This counterargument does not negate its opposite, and it will not save Ukraine.  But it will save each of us as individuals and what makes our lives worth living.  Long live Ukraine!


Keep it real!

Marilyn


 

 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

I FEEL THE EARTH MOVE UNDER MY FEET

  I feel the earth move under my feet I feel the sky tumbling down, tumbling down I just lose control Down to my very soul.                                     Carole King, 1971 This is a very personal post--about a very personal apocalypse, one quite different from the Biblical one imaged above. Carole King's words come to mind because they describe how I feel about this upside down, ass-backwards moment in time.   While there are good things happening in the world, their scale when compared to the bad things that are happening seems to me pitifully dwarfed.  When you look at this short list of events and trends, can you tell me what's right with this picture?  Do these items upset your even keel and threaten to drown you in pessimism?  Consider... Russia and Israel are killin...

THE BROLIGARCHS V. DEMOCRACY

Although not elected by the American people, the world’s wealthiest person, a South African businessman, is running the United States government with the blessing of its chief executive and without meaningful opposition from the legislature or definitive censure by the judiciary.   What is going on?   Has business trumped politics, and if so, doesn’t that raise an interesting question:        Is capitalism compatible with democracy? In pondering this, my research led me to an American billionaire; a German emeritus professor of political science at the Berlin Social Sciences Center; and a Dutch former member of the European Parliament, now a Fellow at the Stanford Cyber Policy Center, all of whom had quite a lot to say.     First, Peter Thiel, the billionaire. Peter Thiel’s Wiki bio says he co-founded PayPal with Elon Musk; he was the initial outside investor in Mark Zuckerberg’s Facebook; and he co-founded Palantir, the big-d...

NEW GAME, NEW RULES

Let me set the stage.   I am a U.S. citizen and a permanent resident of Germany.   In other words, I am an immigrant.   That status didn’t happen overnight and it didn’t come easily.   When we moved to Italy, it took me five years to convert my visa to a Permesso di Soggiorno.   When we subsequently moved to Germany, I had to surrender my Italian residency permit, and it took me another five years to obtain my Daueraufenthaltstitel .   In each country, I jumped through the hoops, produced the necessary documents, fulfilled the language requirements, attended the obligatory immigration appointments, paid my fees, didn’t attempt to work until I could do so legally, and counted the days.   In short, I respected the process and the law.   It has always been crystal clear to me that I live here at the discretion of the German government.   If I screw up, they can “ask” me to leave.   Therefore, I don’t have much sympathy for people who ju...