Skip to main content

FLOWER POWER

Someone I read regularly is New York Times essayist Thomas Edsall, who held the Joseph Pulitzer II and Edith Pulitzer Moore Chair of Journalism at Columbia and now--at age 79--writes a weekly column at the paper.  His guest essay, How Far are Republicans Willing to Go? They’re Already Gone,  published on June 9, 2021 (NYT Edsall) was insightful as always but more alarming than usual. Here is a selection of quotes from that piece (emphasis added).

We have watched with great concern as Republican-led state legislatures across the country have in recent months proposed or implemented…laws politicizing the administration and certification of elections that could enable some state legislatures or partisan election officials to do what they failed to do in 2020:  reverse the outcome of a free and fair election. Further, these laws could entrench extended minority rule, violating the basic and longstanding democratic principle that parties that get the most votes win elections.

              👉Statement of Concern: The Threats to American Democracy and the Need for National Voting and Election Administration Standards

Republicans see the wave of demography coming and they are just trying to hold up a wall and keep it from smashing them in. It’s the last bastion of their dominance, and they are doing everything they can.

 ðŸ‘‰William Frey, senior fellow at the Brookings Institution

The Republican Party sees politics as a zero-sum game:  as the U.S. becomes a majority-minority nation, white voters will constitute a smaller portion of the voting electorate. So in order to win, the party of whites must use every means at its disposal to restrict the voting electorate to “their people.” Because a multiracial democracy is so threatening, Trump supporters will only fight harder in the next election.

            👉 Virginia Gray, University of North Carolina political scientist

Echoing the anti-democracy concerns expressed in NYT Edsall are these calls from writers and academics.

The simple fact of the matter is that the world has never built a multiethnic democracy in which no particular ethnic group is in the majority and where political equality, social equality and economics empower all have been achieved.

          👉 Danielle Allen, from How Democracies Die

The crucial thing to understand about this kind of apocalyptic fantasy [QAnon’s Storm or neo-Nazi’s Day X] is that to people who have adopted militant far-right racial ideologies, a violent overthrow like Day X is not the thing that begins the apocalypse, but the thing that ends it. All of this activism is already in a state of encounter with the end of the world. Immigration, intermarriage and falling birthrates are all leading toward a time when countries like the United States will no longer be majority white. For people in this ideology, that’s already the end of the world. That sense of emergency is really important to understand, because I think without that, the degree of — both the degree of fear and the degree of violence don’t make a lot of sense.

👉 Kathleen Belew, University of Chicago historian, from NYT Accelerationism

If your platform is that elections do not work, you are saying that you intend to come to power some other way. The big lie is designed not to win an election, but to discredit one.

👉Timothy Snyder, Yale University historian

But why rely on a lie, when you could simply embrace the changing demographic and grow your party?  Jacob Grumbach, political scientist at the University of Washington, put forth an interesting insight into why the Republican Party is not a big tent (from NYT Edsall).

The modern Republican Party, which, at its elite level, is a coalition of the very wealthy, has incentives to limit the expansion of the electorate with new voters with very different class interests. The G.O.P.’s electoral base, by contrast, is considerably less interested in the Republican economic agenda of top-heavy tax cuts and reductions in government spending. However, their preference with respect to race and partisan identity provide the Republican electoral base with reason to oppose democracy in a diversifying country.

No one stokes the racism, the partisanship, and the fear of the Republican electoral base, who now comprise 60% of registered Republican voters and who support Donald Trump, better than Tucker Carlson, who recently said the Replacement Theory out loud:

In a democracy, one person equals one vote. If you change the population, you dilute the political power of the people who live there. So every time you import a new voter, I become disenfranchised as a current voter.

So, if your vote threatens to cancel mine, then I can’t let you vote. And if your voters outnumber mine—which they do—then I have to gerrymander your voters into a castrated minority. But just to be on the safe side, to make sure any pesky, constitutional challenges are decided in favor of my "state’s rights," I’ll pack the federal district courts with young, conservative jurists pipe-lined to me by the Federalist Society, who will work their way up to the circuit court of appeals over the next 40 years, and for good measure I’ll establish a 6-3 conservative majority on the Supreme Court for the next two generations.  Problem solved!  Minority white rule for the next 25 to 50 years.

Are these anti-democratic measures really going to work, or will the whole system blow in 2022? Or will some unforeseen event or charismatic leader derail this disturbing trend and set a new course, one headed toward the "more perfect union" Americans like to talk about?  At the moment, I don't see that event or leader on the horizon, but that's the thing about the unforeseen.  It's not there until it is.

Waiting for this unseen democracy savior is much like waiting for Godot, but with tragic undertones. The current state of my anxious anticipation feels like 1968 all over again, except instead of fighting a war far away, we are fighting one at home--a war for the soul of America, as President Biden calls it.  I didn’t enjoy coming of age in that era, and I don’t like growing old in this one.  

So, I don’t write about these issues very often anymore and I do my best not to dwell on them, because they make me deeply unhappy.  But I have a new self-defense, waiting room mechanism.  Instead of deja vu-ing 1968, I’ve turned the clock back one more year, to 1967, the Summer of Love and the year of Flower Power.  (Truth be told, I was never a hippie, but I do love flowers, whether in or out of my hair.) So rather than report on the progress of the slo-mo American train wreck, I’d rather share closeups of Berlin flowers.  Much better for my psyche and probably yours, too.

Keep it real!  And wear your damn mask!

Marilyn



 



 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

I FEEL THE EARTH MOVE UNDER MY FEET

  I feel the earth move under my feet I feel the sky tumbling down, tumbling down I just lose control Down to my very soul.                                     Carole King, 1971 This is a very personal post--about a very personal apocalypse, one quite different from the Biblical one imaged above. Carole King's words come to mind because they describe how I feel about this upside down, ass-backwards moment in time.   While there are good things happening in the world, their scale when compared to the bad things that are happening seems to me pitifully dwarfed.  When you look at this short list of events and trends, can you tell me what's right with this picture?  Do these items upset your even keel and threaten to drown you in pessimism?  Consider... Russia and Israel are killin...

THE BROLIGARCHS V. DEMOCRACY

Although not elected by the American people, the world’s wealthiest person, a South African businessman, is running the United States government with the blessing of its chief executive and without meaningful opposition from the legislature or definitive censure by the judiciary.   What is going on?   Has business trumped politics, and if so, doesn’t that raise an interesting question:        Is capitalism compatible with democracy? In pondering this, my research led me to an American billionaire; a German emeritus professor of political science at the Berlin Social Sciences Center; and a Dutch former member of the European Parliament, now a Fellow at the Stanford Cyber Policy Center, all of whom had quite a lot to say.     First, Peter Thiel, the billionaire. Peter Thiel’s Wiki bio says he co-founded PayPal with Elon Musk; he was the initial outside investor in Mark Zuckerberg’s Facebook; and he co-founded Palantir, the big-d...

NEW GAME, NEW RULES

Let me set the stage.   I am a U.S. citizen and a permanent resident of Germany.   In other words, I am an immigrant.   That status didn’t happen overnight and it didn’t come easily.   When we moved to Italy, it took me five years to convert my visa to a Permesso di Soggiorno.   When we subsequently moved to Germany, I had to surrender my Italian residency permit, and it took me another five years to obtain my Daueraufenthaltstitel .   In each country, I jumped through the hoops, produced the necessary documents, fulfilled the language requirements, attended the obligatory immigration appointments, paid my fees, didn’t attempt to work until I could do so legally, and counted the days.   In short, I respected the process and the law.   It has always been crystal clear to me that I live here at the discretion of the German government.   If I screw up, they can “ask” me to leave.   Therefore, I don’t have much sympathy for people who ju...