Lest you
thought the climate crisis had gone away, here’s a quick and dirty to disabuse
you of that wishful thinking.
OH, NO-O-O-O-(A)! In
early June, NOOA predicted that 2020 was shaping up to be the hottest on record
in the lower 48 United States, which is saying something, since each of the
last five summers has set a heat record.
THE ARCTIC IS ON FIRE! As the
Guardian reported on June 25,
There’s an Arctic heatwave: it’s 38°
C in Siberia. Arctic sea ice coverage is the second lowest on record, and 2020
may be on course to be the hottest year since records began.
The
immediate effect is to increase wildfires. Siberia has seen “zombie fires” reignited from deep
smouldering embers in peatland. This is bad news, releasing particulate air
pollution and more carbon in 18 months than in the past 16 years.
THE CDC
FAILS---AGAIN. Heat kills. Federal research predicts heatstroke and
similar illnesses will claim tens of thousands of American lives each year by
the end of the century. An investigative report by the Guardian (Guardian
Climate Deaths) in conjunction with Columbia Journalism Investigations, the
Center for Public Integrity, and Covering Climate Now found that the CDC isn’t
helping:
The
US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) is charged with helping
cities and states adapt to threats like extreme heat. Its climate program,
created more than 10 years ago, is the federal government’s only sustained
effort to bolster state and local health departments’ fight against global
warming. But the program has been hampered by a decade of underfunding, limited
expertise and political resistance,…
Interviews
with more than 100 people and a review of hundreds of pages of government
records show the Obama administration, while pushing measures to combat climate
change, missed opportunities to expand the program. In December 2015,
Republicans in Congress rejected a proposal to boost spending on the CDC
program to $18m. The increase would have more than doubled its size. Under Donald Trump, officials have tried to
eliminate it.
FROM THE SAHARA RIGHT TO YOUR FRONT DOOR. The
same day the Guardian also reported
on the Saharan dust cloud barreling across the Atlantic toward the U.S. The good news is that the dust reflects
sunlight back into the atmosphere, slightly reducing temperatures. The bad news
is the dust is very, very fine and exacerbates respiratory problems:
The
most sensitive groups to particle pollution include those with respiratory
problems and older people, including those with asthma and covid-19, the
disease caused by the novel coronavirus.
WHAT THE CORONAVIRUS GIVETH, MAN
TAKETH AWAY. Thanks to the coronavirus, carbon dioxide
emissions plunged globally by an average of 17% in April, compared with
2019. But now that much of the world has
reopened, emissions have surged again to within 5% of last year’s levels. Per Fatih Birol, executive director of the
International Energy Agency:
This
year is the last time we have, if we are not to see a carbon rebound. The next three years will determine the course
of the next 30 years and beyond. If we do not [take action] we will surely see
a rebound in emissions. If emissions rebound, it is very difficult to see how
they will be brought down in future. This is why we are urging governments to
have sustainable recovery packages.
As reported
in the Guardian, the stimulus
packages created in 2020 will determine the shape of the global economy for the
next three years, according to Birol, and within that time emissions must start
to fall sharply and permanently, or climate targets will be out of reach. The target is a 7.5% decrease in emissions
each year for ten years, starting in 2020.
We’ve already blown that budget.
TALK IS CHEAP. Guardian
Climate notes that, while some governments are poised to take action in
their coronavirus recoveries, the money spent so far has been propping up the
high-carbon economy:
At
least $33bn has been directed towards airlines, with few or no green strings attached,…According to analyst
company Bloomberg
New Energy Finance, more than half a trillion dollars worldwide – $509bn –
is to be poured into high-carbon industries, with no conditions to ensure they
reduce their carbon output.
Only
about $12.3bn of the spending announced by late [May] was set to go towards
low-carbon industries, and a further $18.5bn into high-carbon industries
provided they achieve climate targets. But governments were still targeting
high-carbon investment, [and] IEA research show[s] that by the end of May the
amount invested in coal-fired power plants in Asia had accelerated compared
with last year.
ARE PEOPLE REALLY THAT STUPID? APPARENTLY, YES. Latex
gloves, masks, toilet paper substitutes, and sanitary wipes are being flushed
down the toilet or dropped carelessly on the street, clogging up municipal
sewer systems. According to an AP report:
Between
mid-March, when [Philadelphia’s] stay-at-home order was issued, and the end of
April, most of the 19 sewer and storm water pumping stations in Philadelphia
had experienced clogs from face masks, gloves and wipes residents had pitched
into the potty.
Sanitary
sewer overflows jumped 33% between February and March in Houston because of
clogs from rags, tissues, paper towels and wipes, said public works department
spokeswoman Erin Jones.
In
Murfreesboro, Tennessee, crews are cleaning sewage pumping stations a couple of
times a week that previously needed it once a month, said John Strickland,
manager of the treatment facility.
At
Beale Air Force Base in Northern California, a squadron that usually deals with
airfield maintenance and weaponry disposal has been yanking wipes from the
base’s plumbing.
By
flushing the wrong things, people are taxing infrastructure that’s already
deteriorating, said Darren Olson, vice chairman of the American Society of
Civil Engineers’ Committee for America’s Infrastructure.
A SECONDARY PLAGUE: SINGLE-USE PLASTIC. A
report in the LA
Times highlights the unfortunate byproduct of the coronavirus--the
proliferation of single-use plastic:
The
coronavirus pandemic has brought a dramatic increase in the use of plastic, the
main component in masks, gloves, hand sanitizer bottles, protective medical
suits, test kits, takeout containers, delivery packaging and other items central
to our new, locked-down, hyper-hygienic way of life.
The
disposal of such items is yet another troubling consequence of a crisis that
has devastated economies and wracked healthcare systems. The deeper worry is
that COVID-19 will reverse the momentum of a years-long global battle to cut
down on single-use plastic.
Coming
into this year, many nations had promised to reduce plastic use. The pandemic
has forced some to shelve those plans; the World Bank warns that COVID-19, at
least for now, “seems to be shifting the tide toward single-use plastics.”
THE GULF OF MEXICO IS DEAD TO
ME. Heavy rainfall, flooding in the Midwest, and the overuse
of fertilizers and pesticides have caused hypoxia, a low level of oxygen that
has created a dead zone in the Gulf of Mexico, shown above.
Large reductions in pesticides and fertilizers have been called for in federal-state
action plans for almost 20 years, but without actions and therefore without results. Per an article in The New York Times, NOOA forecasts that:
This
year’s zone will be about 6,700 square miles, or roughly the size of
Connecticut and Delaware combined. That’s not the biggest recorded, which was
9,776 square miles in 2017, but it is significantly larger than the five-year
average.
AND FINALLY, EXTINCTION. And
saving the last for last, this report from The
New York Times at Times
Extinction:
We
are racing faster and closer toward the point of collapse than scientists
previously thought, according to research published in the Proceedings of the
National Academy of Sciences. The extinction rate among terrestrial vertebrate
species is significantly higher than prior estimates, and the critical window for
preventing mass losses will close much sooner than formerly assumed — in 10 to
15 years.
“We’re
eroding the capabilities of the planet to maintain human life and life in
general,” said Gerardo Ceballos, an ecologist at the National Autonomous
University of Mexico and lead author of the new study.
The
current rate of extinctions vastly exceeds those that would occur naturally,
Dr. Ceballos and his colleagues found. Scientists know of 543 species lost over
the last 100 years, a tally that would normally take 10,000 years to accrue.
“In
other words, every year over the last century we lost the same number of
species typically lost in 100 years,” Dr. Ceballos said.
If
nothing changes, about 500 more terrestrial vertebrate species are likely to go
extinct over the next two decades alone, bringing total losses equivalent to
those that would have taken place naturally over 16,000 years.
Oh, and just
in case you think the warming of the planet is a mere inconvenience, scientists
now believe that 445 million years ago, a volcanic eruption that released
massive amounts of heat into the atmosphere caused the last known extinction known
as the Late Ordovician mass extinction. (See Times
Ordovician.) Have a nice day!
Keep it
real! Wear your mask!
Marilyn












Small nit to pick....the last major extinction event was in the cretaceous period....75% of everything got whacked.....
ReplyDeleteYou're right, thanks! The Ordovician was the earliest known extinction, not the last known.
DeleteExcellent. Thank you for writing this Marilyn. Not fun to think about, but absolutely necessary.
ReplyDeleteThank you for reading and commenting. Sadly, the Tick Tocks are consistently the least read of all my posts. People just don't want to hear about the looming climate disaster and seem to have given up without putting up much of a fight. Mother Nature, however, is battling back. Pink algae now decorates the Italian Alps.
Delete