It’s been
exactly one month since I last posted about the climate. So it seemed about time to do a climate
round-up to see what’s been going on in plain sight while we were focused on the
coronavirus. Spoiler alert:
The climate disaster never sleeps.
Kolkata Got Klobbered.
As reported in The New York Times
on May 21:
More
than 80 people were killed by the powerful cyclone that slammed into India and
Bangladesh on Wednesday, wiping out thousands of homes and drenching low-lying
areas in torrential rain….
Many
of the dead were crushed by falling trees, electrocuted by downed wires or
buried inside collapsing buildings as Cyclone Amphan pummeled the region,
leaving a wide swath of devastation and grief.
The
worst damage was reported in the Indian state of West Bengal, which includes
the metropolis of Kolkata and many small, coastal villages where people live in
shacks made from mud and sticks.
More than
2.4 million were evacuated from Bangladesh and around 600,000 from India. Think evacuees were able to socially distance in the shelters? Think many of these poor souls had protective
masks?
Don’t Count on FEMA. The National Oceanographic and Atmospheric
Association released its annual major storm predictions last week. Mother Nature is expected to be a busy little
bee this hurricane season. NOAA forecasts
a 70% chance of 13 to 19 named storms, six to 10 of which will become
hurricanes, 3 to 6 of which could be Category 3 or greater. Seems like NOAA is all over it; Tropical
Storm Bertha slammed into South Carolina and Florida this week, dumping 7.27
inches of rain on Miami. But help might
not be on the way this season. Per The New York Times:
The
acting deputy administrator of the Federal Emergency Management Agency said the
coronavirus pandemic could add to the challenges of the season.
In
a document issued on Wednesday, FEMA said it would
“minimize the number of personnel deploying to disaster-impacted areas” this
hurricane season, relying instead on what the agency called virtual forms of
assistance.
What the
heck is a "virtual form of assistance" and why would you want one when you need the real thing? Would you want a virtual house, a virtual car, or virtual money? No, I didn't think so.
Dam That Was Close! A 500-year rainfall event in
Michigan breached two dams, sending floodwaters into a sprawling, century-old Dow
chemical complex with a small, on-site nuclear reactor used in product research,
raising concerns of wider environmental fallout (no pun intended). Among other things, the Dow plant made Styrofoam, Saran Wrap (not to be confused with the poisonous gas--but wait!), Agent Orange and mustard gas. Dow filed an “unusual event” report with the
federal Nuclear Regulatory Commission. (I bet they did!) Fortunately, the reactor had already been shut
down because of the coronavirus crisis. But
Michiganders might not be so lucky next time. Per The
New York Times:
The
threat to the Dow complex highlights the risks to Superfund and other toxic
cleanup sites posed by the effects of climate change, which include more
frequent and severe flooding. A federal report published last year found that 60
percent of Superfund sites overseen by the E.P.A., or more than 900 toxic sites
countrywide, are in areas that may be affected by flooding or wildfires, both
hazards that may be exacerbated by climate change.
The
Trump administration rejected the report’s recommendation that the federal
government provide more clarity on how it intends to incorporate climate
research into readying these sites to withstand a changing climate.
April is the Cruelest Month and Also
the Warmest. April 2020 clocked in at the warmest April on
record. NOAA, using its own temperature
monitoring data, reported that there is a 75 percent chance that 2020 will
become the planet’s warmest year since instrument records began in 1880. And it gets even better. Per The
Washington Post:
Assuming
NOAA ranks April as having global average temperatures above the 20th-century
average, it would be the 424th straight month to have that distinction.
In other words, those who are 35
years old and younger have never experienced a cooler-than-average month on
Earth.
Climate Change? “It’s going to
disappear. One day, it’s like a miracle,
it will disappear.” Great Britain, scheduled to hold the
U.N.’s annual global climate talks in Glasgow this November, has proposed
putting the talks off until November 2021 because of the coronavirus. Per The
New York Times:
Delaying
the talks by a full year could have other repercussions, some diplomats say. It
could encourage countries and international financial institutions to enact
economic recovery plans without paying much heed to their climate implications.
Ya think?!
Excuse Me, But That’s My Habitat You’re
Trespassing. The coronavirus is a zoonotic disease, and like
environmental destruction, it has a clear connection to the climate crisis. Per The
New York Times:
The
destruction of forests into fragmented patches is increasing the likelihood
that viruses and other pathogens will jump from wild animals to humans, according
to a study from Stanford University published this
month.
The
research, which focused on contact between humans and primates in western
Uganda, holds lessons for a world reeling from the coronavirus outbreak and
searching for strategies to prevent the next global pandemic.
Eric
Lambin, a professor of Earth system science at Stanford and one of the study’s
co-authors, said that the United States has its own example of an animal-borne
disease linked to patchwork woodlands close to suburban and rural communities:
Lyme disease, which spreads from wildlife to humans by ticks.
“We
see the animals as infecting us, but the picture that’s coming from the study
and other studies is we really go to the animals,” said Dr. Lambin. “We intrude
on their habitats.”
“I Really Don’t CARES. Do EU?” While the U.S.
clearly does not, the EU appears to--at least its leadership (above) wears masks. Their
motto is, "This is Europe's moment" and to prove it, the EU Commission proposed a coronavirus recovery plan that will pour
€750B into green technologies and create one million green jobs, while funneling
€40B to coal producing countries to aid their transition to clean energy. The plan is not without its critics. As reported yesterday in The Guardian:
The
EU’s plan seeks to pour money into emissions-busting sectors:
€91bn a year for home energy efficiency and green heating, €25bn of renewable
energy, and €20bn for clean cars over two years, plus 2m charging points in five
years. Up to €60bn will go to zero-emissions trains and the production of 1m
tonnes of clean hydrogen is planned.
But
despite the European commission saying “public investments in the recovery
should respect the green oath to ‘do no harm’”, critics worry there are no hard
guarantees against the money seeping into dirty projects. The Covid-19 crisis
has seen polluters lobbying hard for bailouts.
That has a familiar American ring to it--Boeing, Boeing, gone.
In
addition to the recovery funds, the EU’s proposed €1.1T budget for 2021-2027 reserves 25% of its
expenditures for climate projects, which critics say is inadequate. Again
per The Guardian:
Worse,
say critics, climate conditions on large parts of the main EU budget have been
lifted for three years because of the pandemic. The proportion of the budget
reserved for climate projects remains stuck at 25%, despite demands by the
European parliament and many others to raise it.
The
commission rejects these criticisms, saying the “objective of the green economy
is present throughout the whole management of the funds”. Whether this
oversight proves effective will be the critical test.
No doubt.
While the
Trump Administration continues to shred environmental regulations like Oliver North hiding the Iran-Contra Affair, and China begins
to relax restrictions in an effort to restart its virus-damaged economy, the EU
is at least putting its euros where its mouth is. Time will tell, however, if the talk is
cheap. Oversight will be critically
important in ensuring that EU recovery funds and designated budget amounts find
their way into green projects. But I
like the direction reported in The
Guardian:
Frans
Timmermans, the European commission vice-president who oversees the European
green deal, said the EU needed to ensure it was not putting money into the
industries of the past.
“For
many regions and companies including those relying on coal production and
carbon-intensive industrial processes, this economic crisis has raised an
existential question,” he told journalists. “Do we rebuild what we ha[d]
before or do we seize the opportunity to restructure and create different and
new jobs?
“In
all the actions we are going to take, we apply the ‘do no harm’ principle so
you can’t have investment that takes us in a different direction.”
Timmermanns’
sentiment was echoed by EU commission president, Ursula von der Leyen, above, who said:
“Sooner
or later we will find a vaccine for the coronavirus. But there is no vaccine
for climate change. Therefore [we] need a recovery plan designed for the
future.”
Keep it
real! Wear your mask!
Marilyn










Comments
Post a Comment