This morning,
as I was making breakfast, I tuned into the middle of a Morning Edition interview on NPR with Jason Isbell, someone I had
never heard of. He’s a successful country
and western musician from Muscle Shoals, Alabama; a four-time Grammy winner;
and a recovering alcoholic. He talked
about the closing of small, independent music venues all over the U.S. and the
hardship and heartache that brings to performers and club owners alike. But there was something he said that confirmed what I've been thinking about. Isbell predicted, “This
pandemic is going to be really hard on addicts everywhere.” I found that
particularly relevant to two recent news items.
The first is
the jobs report. Last week, roughly
three million Americans filed for unemployment benefits, bringing the eight-week
total to over 36.5 million claims and, as the Washington Post put it, “erasing years of economic gains and
threatening lasting devastation to the country that rivals even the Great
Depression.” That’s a big percentage of
the workforce out of a job, around 15%, but as with pandemic infection and
mortality rates, the numbers are not evenly distributed. According to The New York Times,
In
an analysis of the latest unemployment-claims report, the U.S. Chamber of
Commerce found that in 11 states, more
than a quarter of those in the work force in February were now unemployed. And
a survey by the Federal Reserve
found that in households making less than $40,000 a year, nearly 40 percent of
those who were working in February lost their jobs in March or the beginning of
April.
Because
health care is typically tied to employment in the U.S., that means that 36.5
million Americans are now not only looking for work, they’re also looking for
health insurance in the middle of a pandemic.
Some of the unemployed are—in theory—eligible for alternative coverage
under Medicaid (if they’re poor enough and live in a state that expanded
coverage), COBRA (if they can afford it), or on the Obamacare insurance
exchanges (if the U.S. Supreme Court doesn’t side with the Trump Administration
and declare the law unconstitutional). But
based on a study by the Kaiser Family Foundation out last month, about 6.5
million are likely to remain uninsured until they find another job that offers
health benefits. The other 30 million may
or may not actually find a
health care solution, because health insurance is very complicated and signing up is
really hard.
The second
news item is a decision by the Trump Administration reported on May 6 by Politico:
President
Donald Trump on Wednesday said his administration will urge the Supreme Court
to overturn Obamacare, maintaining its all-out legal assault on the health care
law amid a pandemic that will drive millions of more Americans to depend on its
coverage.
The
administration appears to be doubling down on its legal strategy, even after
Attorney General William Barr this week warned top Trump officials about the
political ramifications of undermining the health care safety net during the
coronavirus emergency.
Comforting to
know that Barr caved to what is actually the President's re-election strategy rather than fulfill his duty to apply the law to the facts, without regard to politics. But that’s completely in
line with his answer this week when asked how he thought history would judge
his decision to drop all criminal charges against Michael Flynn, Trump’s first
national security advisor, who pleaded guilty in open court to lying to the
FBI--twice. Barr’s answer? “History is written by the winners, so it
largely depends on who’s writing the history.” Nice respect for the rule of
law, Billy Bob, replied over 2,000 former U.S. Attorneys, who called for his
resignation. Fat chance.
But it’s
not Barr’s disrespect for, and politicization of, the law that got me thinking
about how his leadership of the Justice Department will affect who gets and
doesn’t get health insurance during this pandemic and how that will cause the increase
in addiction Isbell foresees. It was his speech at the Notre Dame School of
Law last year, which I wrote about last October. That
speech popped up again this January in a New
Yorker profile of Barr at The New Yorker:
Last
October, Attorney General William Barr appeared at Notre Dame Law School to
make a case for ideological warfare. Before an assembly of students and
faculty, Barr claimed that the “organized destruction” of religion was under
way in the United States. “Secularists, and their allies among the
‘progressives,’ have marshaled all the force of mass communications, popular
culture, the entertainment industry, and academia in an unremitting assault on
religion and traditional values,” he said. Barr, a conservative Catholic,
blamed the spread of “secularism and moral relativism” for a rise in “virtually
every measure of social pathology”—from the “wreckage of the family” to “record
levels of depression and mental illness, dispirited young people, soaring suicide
rates, increasing numbers of angry and alienated young males, an increase in
senseless violence, and a deadly drug epidemic.”
Let me
repeat that: Barr claims the assault on
religion and traditional values is responsible for “record levels of depression
and mental illness, dispirited young people, soaring suicide rates, increasing
numbers of angry and alienated young males, an increase in senseless violence,
and a deadly drug epidemic.”
That is,
quite simply, a load of crap. And,
typical of Barr, his false claim serves to distract from the real causes of
what are called “deaths of despair.” A
new book by Princeton University economists Anne Case and her husband Angus
Deaton, Deaths of Despair and the Future
of Capitalism (Princeton), investigated the connection between two societal
trends in the U.S.: one, the increase in the
number of people who suffer from chronic pain, and two, the disconnect between health
and wealth on the one hand and happiness on the other.
Dr. Atul Gawande,
a surgeon and public health researcher, reviewed the book at
They
combed through survey data together and found that communities with higher
rates of chronic pain also had higher rates of suicide. What’s more, rates of
both had risen markedly for middle-aged, non-Hispanic white Americans—but not
for black or Hispanic Americans. And the data grew only more curious and
concerning the further they looked. As Case and Deaton… dug deeper into
national vital statistics and compared rates of suicide with those of other
causes of mortality, “To our astonishment, it was not only suicide that was
rising among middle-aged whites; it was all
deaths,” they write.
This
was nearly unfathomable. Outside of wars or pandemics, death rates for large
populations across the world have been consistently falling for decades. Yet
working-age white men and women without college degrees were dying from
suicide, drug overdoses, and alcohol-related liver disease at such rates that,
for three consecutive years, life expectancy for the U.S. population as a whole
had fallen.
Case and
Deaton decided to find out why the American dream had turned into a nightmare
for white, working class, non-college educated Americans. By looking at the data, they were able to
eliminate the usual suspects and isolate the real culprits. It’s not the rise of secularism or moral
relativism and the decline of religion, as Bill Barr wants you to believe. It’s the unfairness of the American economy
and its healthcare system. This is what
Case and Deaton found.
It’s not an oversupply of opioids.
About 1 million Americans use heroin or synthetic opioids like fentanyl
daily. Most users are functional and many
eventually kick their habits. Among those
who don’t, opioid deaths are unevenly distributed. White college-educated Americans account for only
about nine percent of overdose deaths; the percentage of blacks and Hispanics is
even smaller. The vast majority of overdose
deaths occur among white working class users.
Further, although opioid deaths flattened temporarily in 2018, the
increase in suicides and alcohol-related deaths continued to rise.
It’s not obesity.
Obesity increases chronic illness and joint pain and tracks regional and
demographic patterns that line up with deaths of despair. But Case and Deaton report seeing the same mortality
trends—deaths linked to suicide, domestic violence, alcoholism, and substance
abuse --among the underweight, normal weight, overweight, and obese.
It’s not poverty.
Despite a fall in poverty rates beginning in the 1990s, white working
class death rates have not declined for the past 30 years. Interestingly, overdose deaths are most
common in high-poverty Appalachia and
along the low-poverty Eastern Seaboard.
It’s not income inequality.
Case and Deaton found that patterns of inequality don’t match the
patterns of mortality by race or region. For example, California and New York have
among the highest inequality levels in the country and the lowest mortality
rates.
It’s not cultural, either.
Conservatives tend to give cultural explanations for these deaths of
despair, as Barr does in his Notre Dame address and J. D. Vance does in Hillbilly Elegy. They claim people are lazy and shirk responsibility,
choosing of their own volition alcohol, drugs, and welfare and disability
checks over a commitment to hard work, family, and community. But as Gawande convincingly argues in his
review of Deaths of Despair:
Yet,
if the main problem were that a large group of people were withdrawing from the
workforce by choice, wages should have risen in parallel. Employers should have
been pulling out the stops to lure people back to work. But they haven’t. Wages
have stayed flat for years.
So what
does explain the rise in deaths of despair among white, non-college-educated
Americans? Two things, both related and
working in tandem: Wage stagnation (including
a total loss of wages through loss of a job) and the complicated and costly American
health care system.
As for wage
stagnation, Case and Deaton found that the communities with higher rates of
unemployment or underemployment are also the communities with higher rates of death
by suicide, drug overdoses, and alcohol-related liver disease. In fact, per capita economic growth; i.e.,
wages, has declined since the end of World War II, when growth averaged between 2 and
3%. Then it dropped below 2% in the
1990s; now it’s below 1.5%. But wage
declines, like deaths of despair, haven’t been experienced equally. Earnings of college graduates have soared. Anti-discrimination laws have improved
earnings and job prospects for black and Hispanic Americans. Expectations matter. While their earnings and job prospects still
lag behind those of the white working class, the economic lives of blacks and
Hispanics have improved, and these fulfilled or exceeded expectations likely
account for the fact that deaths of despair have left the black and Hispanic community
relatively untouched.
But expectations
have not improved for whites without a college education. On the contrary, they have been betrayed. Among working class white men, median wages
have declined since 1979. The work non-college-educated Americans of both sexes find is less stable, the hours more uncertain,
and the duration shorter. They tend to
work in the gig economy, temporary contracting, or day labor, work which is
less likely to come with health insurance.
Gawande explains:
Among
advanced economies, this deterioration in pay and job stability is unique to
the United States. In the past four decades, Americans without bachelor’s
degrees—the majority of the working-age population—have seen themselves become
ever less valued in our economy. Their effort and experience provide smaller
rewards than before, and they encounter longer periods between employment. It
should come as no surprise that fewer continue to seek employment, and that
more succumb to despair.
Case and
Deaton also lay the blame for deaths of despair at the door of a complicated and
costly American healthcare system that is “peculiarly reliant on employer-provided
insurance.” Gawande explains how
employers pay a kind of perverse tax on hiring lower-skilled workers:
According
to the Kaiser Family Foundation, in 2019 the average family policy cost
twenty-one thousand dollars, of which employers typically paid seventy per
cent. “For a well-paid employee earning a salary of $150,000, the average
family policy adds less than 10 percent to the cost of employing the worker,”
Case and Deaton write. “For a low-wage worker on half the median wage, it is 60
percent.” Even as workers’ wages have stagnated or declined, then, the cost to
their employers has risen sharply. One recent study shows that, between 1970
and 2016, the earnings that laborers received fell twenty-one per cent. But
their total compensation, taken to include the cost of their benefits (in
particular, health care), rose sixty-eight per cent. Increases in health-care
costs have devoured take-home pay for those below the median income. At the
same time, the system practically begs employers to reduce the number of less
skilled workers they hire, by outsourcing or automating their positions. In
Case and Deaton’s analysis, this makes American health care itself a prime
cause of our rising death rates.
Ignoring
the twin sources of deaths of despair—the economy and the healthcare system-- in
the context of the massive increase in unemployment triggered by the pandemic risks
the spread of those deaths of despair beyond white Americans without college degrees
to the unemployed workforce at large. That
will lead to unprecedented, geographically, and demographically widespread despair throughout the U.S. replicating everywhere lines for food banks like the one in Florida above. Some of that despair will
manifest as anger toward immigrants and perceived “inferiors,” but most of it will
be experienced as a sense of hopelessness and helplessness, and those feelings will be drowned
in alcohol and smoothed over with drugs. Again per Gawande:
When
it comes to people whose lives aren’t going well, American culture is a harsh
judge: if you can’t find enough work, if your wages are too low, if you can’t
be counted on to support a family, if you don’t have a promising future, then
there must be something wrong with you. When people discover that they can numb
negative feelings with alcohol or drugs, only to find that addiction has made
them even more powerless, it seems to confirm that they are to blame.
The problem
isn’t, as Barr would like us to believe, that people aren’t the way they used
to be, or that secularization and moral relativism have destroyed American
society. The problem is that the economy
and the structure of work itself are not the way they used to be, and that these systemic
flaws are destroying American society. These are the flaws responsible for deaths of despair. And I
fear that after the pandemic, the economy and the structure of work will bear
even less resemblance to “the time before.”
So when people like Barr try to convince me that it is the Democrats, Harvard,
The New York Times, and Hollywood who
are responsible for the “wreckage of the family, record levels of depression
and mental illness, dispirited young people, soaring suicide rates, increasing
numbers of angry and alienated young males, an increase in senseless violence,
and a deadly drug epidemic,” I do what Emma Gonzales from Marjorie Stoneman
Douglas High School in Parkland, FL did, “I call bull shit!”
Mr. Barr will not distract me with some First
Amendment bogus argument that uses faith as a political cover-up of an economic
problem. He will not "Barr" me from seeing the foreseeable. Nope. Not falling for it. It’s the economy, stupid! And if you don’t believe me, listen to what Jason
Isbell said on Twitter to a fan in November 2017. When asked,
"Why
do we have to inject politics in every aspect of our life? Can't we just enjoy the music and the
football games?" Isbell responded, "Until you are the one being
treated unfairly, that's easy to say."
Tell it
like it is, Jason. Straight outta Muscle Shoals.
Keep it
real! Wear your mask!
Marilyn












Well its not like there is a lot to laugh about these days....I think a critical failure in our society is the capacity for free thought and generating an opinion with you own mind and not getting it spoon fed by the media, critical thinking is in danger of large scale extinction in America. How else can you explain teh shit show were are in the middle of? Smart phones have doomed civil disobedience. If Trump had somehow existed in a world without social media and smart phones and endless talking heads, the people would have taken to the streets by the millions and misted him and all of his Gambino wannabes.
ReplyDeleteYou're absolutely right about the demise of critical thinking. That's an essential skill that should be honed in grade school, but if taught at all, it's learned in college, which puts it out of reach for most Americans. But that's just one thing. There are so many things that have gone wrong in the country of which I used to be mightily proud. Now I'm mostly ashamed and terribly sad. That's the price we pay for looking the truth straight in the eye and refusing to accept the lie. But pay it we must.
DeleteInteresting that current increase in Covid-2 cases tracks pretty much exactly the States hurt the most by the opioid crisis. Perhaps because they see that there is not much to live for, so why not just throw the dice and see if it comes up Boxcars.
ReplyDeletehttps://www.axios.com/newsletters/axios-am-4f320914-bcd6-4814-ac5f-ec6db3c59074.html
Thanks, honey, my editor-in-chief. I wasn't aware of that and will check out the link. Thanks!
ReplyDelete