Fascism is racism
dressed up in a fancy political frock.
Whether the haute couture
comes from the House of Mussolini or Hitler, Modi or Franco, Nigel Farage or Stephen
Miller, these society designers are all throwing the same nasty party after the
runway show, with the same guests of (dis)honor: the foreigner, the Jew, the Muslim, the
immigrant, the person of color. Remove
the fascist party dress and you’ll find naked racism stripped bare.
Racism and
fascism are so prevalent that they rarely catch our attention without a story. And when that story is a love story, racism
and fascism make headlines. And when
the lovers are Royals, well, then, POW! This
is the tale of two Royal love stories separated by over 80 years: the Greatest Love Story of the 20th
Century, the story of the Duke and Duchess of Windsor, and what’s shaping up to
be the Greatest Love Story of the 21st Century, the story of the
Duke and Duchess of Sussex.
Starting in
the current century, hear the saga of Meghan Markle and Prince Harry, the latest
victims in the timeless fashion of British racism. While not as widely discussed or as blatant in
the UK as it is in the US, racism is fully enmeshed in British colonial and
modern history, as this article from Afua Hirsch, a black British journalist
writing in The New York Times at NYT Black Britons, notes:
In
Britain’s rigid class society, there is still a deep correlation between
privilege and race. The relatively few people of color — and even fewer if you
count only those who have African heritage — who rise to prominence and
prosperity in Britain are often told we should be “grateful” or told to leave if
we don’t like it here.
The
legacy of Britain’s history of empire — a global construct based on a doctrine
of white supremacy — its pioneering role in the slave trade and ideologies of
racism that enabled it, and policies of recruiting people from the Caribbean
and Africa for low-paid work and then discriminating against them in education
and housing, is with us today.
Racism quite
simply played a pivotal role in Meghan and Harry’s decision to withdraw from
their Senior Royal duties. The Sussex
Royals, as they’ve branded themselves in an oh-so-21st-century mode,
have been harassed along racial lines since they started dating. Back in 2016, Harry pleaded with the media to
stop the “wave of abuse and harassment” against Meghan, citing a
"smear" on the front page of a national newspaper, "racial
undertones" in opinion pieces, and "outright sexism and racism of
social media trolls."
Since their
marriage and the birth of their son, Archie, it’s gotten so bad that they’re voluntarily exiling to Canada. The announcement to decamp may have come as a
surprise to the Firm and the British tabloids, but it comes as no surprise to Hirsch,
who names and shames the racist factors compelling their decision:
If
the media paid more attention to Britain’s communities of color, perhaps it
would find the announcement [of Meghan and Harry’s withdrawal from royal duties]
far less surprising. With a new prime minister whose track record includes
overtly racist statements, some of which would make even Donald Trump blush, a
Brexit project linked to native nationalism and a desire to rid Britain of
large numbers of immigrants, and an ever thickening loom of imperial nostalgia,
many of us are also thinking about moving.
If you
think her analysis is a little overwrought, have a look at the Royals' reaction to Reverend Curry's benediction at the wedding above, read the affronts below, and then delve into this
shocking story of Britain’s recent deportation of Caribbean Commonwealth citizens from
the Windrush Generation who entered Britain between 1948 and 1970 at LRB
Windrush.
From the Daily Mail:
EXCLUSIVE:
Harry's girl is (almost) straight outta Compton: Gang-scarred home of her mother revealed - so
will he be dropping by for tea?
·
Prince
Harry's new girl, Suits star Meghan Markle, is from Crenshaw, LA
·
Crenshaw
has endured 47 crimes in the past week - including murder
·
Gangs,
including the Bloods, count the neighborhood as their territory
·
Markle's
social worker mom, Doria Ragland, lives in the run-down area
·
And
the actress's aunt, Ava Burrow, is in nearby gang-afflicted Inglewood
Boris
Johnson’s sister (!), writing for The
Daily Mail (photo of Meghan from the article, above):
So
I have done my due diligence on Miss Markle, and this is where I stand.
Genetically, she is blessed. If there is
issue from her alleged union with Prince Harry, the Windsors will thicken their
watery, thin blue blood and Spencer pale skin and ginger hair with some rich
and exotic DNA .
Princess
Michael of Kent’s choice of accessories:
A
British princess apologized on Friday for wearing a brooch considered
"racist" to Meghan Markle's first meeting with the royal family. The
apology came after Princess Michael of Kent wore a blackamoor brooch on her
left shoulder to the queen's annual Christmas lunch at Buckingham Palace. Some
deemed it a slight to Meghan Markle, who attended the event with her fiancé
Prince Harry.
This cruel
tweet from a BBC 5 Live presenter:
The
BBC has sacked Danny Baker, saying he showed a "serious error of
judgement" over his tweet about the Duke and Duchess of Sussex's baby.
The
tweet, which he later deleted but which has been circulated on social media,
showed an image of a couple holding hands with a chimpanzee dressed in clothes
with the caption: "Royal Baby leaves hospital".
And last
but not least, from The Spectator:
Obviously,
70 years ago, Meghan Markle would have been the kind of woman the prince would
have had for a mistress, not a wife”.
There is ample
evidence of this. A 1988 biography, Wallis: Secret Lives of the Duchess of Windsor by Charles Higham, reviewed
in the London Review of Books at LRB Wallis, chronicles Mrs. Simpson’s fascist
arc. She was born into a wealthy upper
middle class family and married a US Air Force officer named Earl Spencer. The couple moved to Washington, where she promptly
became romantically involved with Mussolini’s Ambassador and the First
Secretary to the Embassy of Argentina, at that time a brutal dictatorship.
Ever the
restless social climber and wanna-be shaper of world events, Wallis left her
cuckolded first husband for a shipping magnate named Ernest Simpson, a US naval
intelligence officer. She herself was recruited
by naval intelligence to carry secret messages to anti-Communist Chinese
warlords. Making the most of her Mata
Hari brief, Wallis had two more affairs while in China, both with Mussolini
fascists. The LRB article notes:
[H]er
feeling for Fascism cannot be attributed only to her men friends. On the
contrary, the ‘new social order’ brayed around the world by the Italian
dictator and his representatives fitted precisely with Wallis’s own upbringing,
character and disposition. She was all her life an intensely greedy woman,
obsessed with her own property and how she could make more of it. She was a
racist through and through: anti-semitic, except when she hoped to benefit from
rich Jewish friends; and anti-black (‘Government House with only a coloured
staff would put me in my grave,’ she moaned when, many years later, her husband
was the Governor of the Bahamas). She was offensive to her servants, and hated
the class they came from.
Her third husband,
the Duke of Windsor, fka King Edward VIII (above), was cut from the same bolt of fascist-racist
cloth, per the LRB article:
Of
all the bonds which united this dreadful woman to the glamorous Prince of Wales
in the late-Twenties, none was so strong as their shared politics. Charles
Higham’s biography sets out the facts about the Prince’s Fascist leanings and
sympathy with the Nazi cause and the corporate state in Italy. The Prince was
proud of his German origins [the royal family name until the end of WWI was
Saxe-Coburg-Gotha], spoke German fluently, and felt an emotional, racial and
intellectual solidarity with the Nazi leaders. As early as July 1933, with
Hitler only just ensconced as German Chancellor, Robert Bruce-Lockhart records
conversations between the Prince and the grandson of the former Kaiser, Prince
Louis-Ferdinand: ‘The Prince of Wales was quite pro-Hitler and said it was no
business of ours to interfere in Germany’s internal affairs either re Jews or
anything else, and added that the dictators are very popular these days, and
that we might want one in England before long.’
King Edward
VIII’s known Nazi sympathies and his secret affair with Wallis Simpson created a
danger to national security which so alarmed the British government, that Prime
Minister Stanley Baldwin ordered MI5 to surveil the couple. He and his Cabinet, including the Archbishop
of Canterbury, finally gave the King an ultimatum: either give up your mistress or the throne. Per LRB:
In
all the innumerable versions of the ‘Greatest Love Story of the Century’ it is
assumed that the British Establishment, led by Stanley Baldwin and the
Archbishop of Canterbury, could not stomach the idea of a monarch marrying a
twice-divorced woman. The objections, it is said, were moral and religious. The
truth is, however, that …[t]he real objection to the liaison between the King
and Mrs Simpson was that both were Nazi sympathisers….
The
prospect of a Nazi King backed up by an infinitely more able and resourceful
Wallis Simpson was intolerable. If the King wanted Mrs Simpson, he would have
to get out. If he wanted to stay as King, she would have to be banished. The
King’s choice (the ‘woman I love’, and exile) came as a great relief to the
Government.
The King abdicated
in December, 1936; he married Simpson in June, 1937, and the couple took the
titles of the Duke and Duchess of Windsor.
Not in the least chastised by his forced ouster, even after their marriage both continued to champion the Nazi
regime. This piece in biography.com at biography details their two-week trip to Germany
in October, 1937, where they were feted by Göring and Goebbels and visited the
Führer at Berghof. Throughout the trip, the
Duke enthusiastically returned the Nazi salute.
This all proved a bit too much for the British Establishment, and the Windsors found themselves exiled
from Britain to the colonies. Their exile was involuntary, and it flowed from their Royal racism and fascism. They were sent to Bermuda, where the Duke became governor of the island and Mrs. Simpson’s
needs, to her endless chagrin, were served by people of color. Delicious!
For the
Sussex Royals, the exile is officially voluntary, but it actually flows from racism
directed at them, some of which is rumored to come from the Royal Family itself.
Unlike the Duke and Duchess of Windsor, the Duke and Duchess of Sussex will live not on a sunny, semi-tropical island but in frosty British Columbia, where they will seek to meet their own needs on their own terms in what they believe to be a more tolerant country. I wish them well.
Unlike the Duke and Duchess of Windsor, the Duke and Duchess of Sussex will live not on a sunny, semi-tropical island but in frosty British Columbia, where they will seek to meet their own needs on their own terms in what they believe to be a more tolerant country. I wish them well.
Despite
the high profile these Royal couples in love give to fascism on the one hand and racism on
the other, there really isn’t much new here.
Both sentiments are still very much in fashion around the world. The ugliness of that fact tends to rivet our attention when the perpetrators or victims are celebrities in their own right. And really,
nothing quite says celebrity like a Royal.
Keep it
real!
Marilyn



















After following the Brexit fiasco for the last three years, it has become clear that the main reason that so many people (mostly older) voted to leave was because they saw that the UK was being "invaded" by non-British blood. This even extended to casting Northern Ireland under the bus, which had practically zero protest in England proper. After all they really aren't English.
ReplyDeleteAs far as Duke and Duchess of Sussex, Meghan was a non-starter for most English as she had the double whammy of not being British, and not being white. This gave the Tabloids the license to endlessly criticize her, which they took full advantage of. Here is a survey from today's Guardian on exactly their rabid approach to her:
https://www.theguardian.com/global/2020/jan/18/meghan-gets-more-than-twice-as-many-negative-headlines-as-positive
It’s interesting that most of the comments I’ve received focus on Meghan and not the Windsors. I think that’s the more interesting story, but of course it’s not current.
Delete