Skip to main content

TICK TOCK THE CLIMATE CLOCK PART SEVEN


Jules Julien for The New York Times

“You really can’t let people’s need for hope get in the way of the telling the truth.”  Ta-Nehisi Coates, American journalist and comic book writer

“It’s the greatest fight in human history, one whose outcome will reverberate for geologic time, and it has to happen right now.”  Bill McKibben, climate activist and writer 
   
                                     Greta Thunberg at Brandenburg Gate


Psychology plays a role in people's perceptions of climate change and their ability to deal with it.  Emotional reactions, both in the individual and in society at large, can run the gamut from denial to panic.  You might say there are six stages of climate grief:   dismissal, doubt, disengagement, caution, concern, and alarm.  For those who are at the last stage, alarm, what is the appropriate action to follow their psychological reaction?  Is it panic, and if so, does panic lead to fight or flight?  Is panic a help or a hindrance to climate solutions?  Here’s a link to a New Yorker article discussing just that--climate psychology, a fascinating subject:  https://www.newyorker.com/science/elements/the-other-kind-of-climate-denialism

Greta Thunberg and the Extinction Rebellion who staged a die-in at London’s Natural History Museum (below) come down squarely on the side of panic-to-fight as a justified and necessary response to climate change, and they are putting the rest of their bodies where their mouths are. 
American journalist David Wallace-Wells in his book, The Uninhabitable Earth, also makes the case for the utility of panic as a catalyst for fight, not flight. 
Here’s a link to his op-ed piece in The New York Times: https://www.nytimes.com/2019/02/16/opinion/sunday/fear-panic-climate-change-warming.html

Wallace-Wells cites these reasons why he thinks alarmism is the right psychological state to induce catastrophic thinking conductive to devising solutions to mitigate climate change.

  • First, climate change is a looming catastrophe that demands an immediate, aggressive global response.   In other words, it's reasonable to be alarmed.
  • Second, by more accurately defining the boundaries of what is conceivable in our future, catastrophic thinking makes it easier to see the threat of climate change clearly.
  • Third, while concern about climate change is growing, complacency remains a very big political problem.  A December 2018, national survey tracking Americans’ attitudes toward climate change found that 73% said global warming was happening, but a majority were unwilling to spend even $10 a month to address it; and most drew the line at $1 a month.

  • Fourth, history.  Catastrophic thinking works; it led to the banning of DDT and mutually-assured nuclear destruction, and the successful campaign against drunk driving.

  • Fifth, we have to shake ourselves out of our intellectual torpor.  We are living a delusion, unable to process the fact that climate change is an existential threat.

  • Finally, what creates a bigger sense of urgency than fear?

So, if we panic but fight, as Bill McKibben urges, can we win or is it too late?  Have we passed a tipping point that creates an endless, unbreakable feedback loop that will spin out of control before it stabilizes?  Or will we miraculously pull it out at the last second with some yet-to-be-discovered technology?  I don’t know.  No one does.

What I know is this.  Flight is not an available option.  We're not all going to be jumping into our spaceships and heading off to Mars anytime soon.  So our only option is to stay and fight, but we must fight collectively, in a coordinated way.  While every single one of us needs to do all that we can and NOW, individual action and conscious consumption are not enough.  What’s needed is global, collective political action.  We’re past the point of dismissal and doubt, and we cannot disengage, because the future is happening whether we acknowledge it or not.  It's too late for caution and concern.  It's time for alarm. 

New York Times photo of a book burned in a California wildfire this year
Keep it real!
Marilyn

Comments

  1. Ein Jeder, der dieses existenzielle Problem nicht verdrängen will, muss bei sich selbst beginnen und seinen Lebensstil ändern und achtsam sein in allen Dingen, denn für Herstellung aller Güter wird Energie verbraucht. Ja sicher, um die Klimakatastrophe zu verhindern ist globales Handeln nötig, aber wenn jeder bewusste Mensch in seinem Umfeld Einfluss nimmt, können wir viel erreichen, und auch das Verantwortungslose Handeln von Politik und Wirtschaft beeinflussen.
    Nur Mut !!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ja wohl! Mach's ich und machen wir's alle.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

IN CASE OF EMERGENCY BREAK GLASS

A vocal critic of Benito Mussolini, Antonio Gramsci, Italian philosopher and politician,  was imprisoned for his political views in 1926; he remained in prison until shortly before his death in 1937.   From his cell, he wrote the  Prison Letters in which he famously said, “I’m a pessimist because of intelligence, but an optimist because of will."   In this time of upheaval, when the post-World War II world order is dying, a new world order is being born, and monsters roam the earth, it is from Gramsci's dual perspective that I write this post.    I will be brief. Th e window to oppose America’ s headlong rush into authoritarianism at home and neo-imperialism abroad by congressional or judicial means has closed.   Law firms, universities, businesses, the press, media, foundations, and individuals alike who have been deemed "insufficiently aligned" with the Administration's agenda, have been intimidated into submission by frivolous lawsuits, expe...

DISPUTING KEATS

The great English poet John Keats wrote in his magnificent 1819 poem, Ode on a Grecian Urn , “Beauty is truth, truth beauty,--that is all Ye know on earth, and all Ye need to know.”  Were that it were so!   But poetry cannot hide the fact that the truth is sometimes ugly.  Consider two current cases. First, the war in Gaza and the destruction and famine it has wrought.   Policy makers, scholars, and pundits can argue whether what is happening in Gaza (and to some extent, in the West Bank) is genocide, whether the leveling of Gaza and the systematic killing of its people is equivalent to the Holocaust, or whether Palestinians have the right to free themselves by any means necessary from an open-air prison.   They can debate whether Israel has become an apartheid, undemocratic state, or whether the only way to achieve security in Israel is to ring-fence or destroy Hamas. And they can construct theories about who has the “right” to live in historic Palestine, e...

THE IRON TRIANGLE

Corruption.   It’s like an operating system running in the background on the Computer of Life that inflects and infects everything we do and what is done to us.   Corruption is epidemic, endemic, and systemic. Universal, it is everywhere and all at once.   When he was the director of the FBI, Robert E. Mueller III gave an address to the Citizens Crime Commission of New York and opened a new window on the operating system of corruption:   transnational organized crime.   He called this new operating system an “iron triangle.” Its three sides:  organized criminals, corrupt government officials, and business leaders.    In her June 17, 2025, Substack , Heather Cox Richardson recalled Mueller’s address in an account of foreign investment in President Trump’s businesses.   She wrote: Eliot Brown of the Wall Street Journal reported that Mukesh Ambani, the richest man in India, is now one of the many wealthy foreign real estate develope...